POST-INVESTMENT REVIEW FOR LEAN INVESTORS

Know where investor attention is needed before issues become obvious.

DueCap provides structured reviews of portfolio companies to help investors see changes in business health, reporting quality, execution risk, and the questions that deserve management or board attention.

Oversight and decision support for the investor - not management of the portfolio company.

WHEN THIS IS USEFUL

Portfolio companies rarely deteriorate in one obvious moment.

The problem is usually fragmented visibility: inconsistent reporting, shifting assumptions, subtle operating changes, and too little time to examine every company with the same depth.

01

Reporting quality varies

Different companies send different KPIs, formats, and levels of detail, making comparison and early warning harder.

02

Problems surface late

Senior investors learn about deteriorating cash, GTM issues, or leadership strain only after they have become harder to reverse.

03

Board packs show activity, not risk

Updates can be comprehensive while still failing to answer whether the investment case is strengthening or weakening.

04

Follow-on decisions need a fresh view

You want questions that go beyond the pitch and probe the parts of the case that matter.

05

No operating partner is available

Lean teams often have capital and relationships, but not a dedicated platform or portfolio-review function.

06

Attention is spread too thin

Not every company needs intervention. The challenge is knowing which ones deserve more investor attention now.

WHAT WE REVIEW

A structured look at the signals behind company health.

The review is not a generic scorecard. We examine the areas most likely to change the investor's understanding of the company and the next conversation with management.

Revenue quality

Growth, concentration, recurring versus non-recurring revenue, retention, pricing, and the quality of underlying demand.


Investor question: Is reported growth becoming more durable or more fragile?

Cash & runway discipline

Burn, cash conversion, runway, hiring commitments, financing assumptions, and where operating plans depend on new capital.


Investor question: Is the company buying enough time to reach the next meaningful milestone?

GTM & pipeline integrity

Pipeline composition, conversion, sales cycle, customer mix, channel dependence, and whether activity translates into economic outcomes.


Investor question: Does the commercial engine support the narrative management is presenting?

KPI & reporting hygiene

Definitions, consistency, trend quality, changing denominators, missing metrics, and whether management reporting is decision-useful.


Investor question: Can we trust the operating picture we are being shown?

Leadership & execution capacity

Key-person dependence, hiring gaps, decision bottlenecks, changing responsibilities, and whether execution capacity matches the plan.


Investor question: What execution risk is currently concentrated in too few people?

Major initiatives & dependencies

Strategic projects, AI initiatives, market expansion, product bets, partnerships, and assumptions that require evidence before they compound risk.


Investor question: Which initiatives are creating measurable value, and which are still narrative?

THE ATTENTION MAP

The output is not more reporting. It is a clearer view of where to look next.

A review should separate companies that are stable from those that need a question, a deeper review, or a decision. The example below illustrates the working logic rather than a fixed scoring system.

PORTFOLIO COMPANY / CURRENT SIGNAL / WHY IT MATTERS / INVESTOR ATTENTION

Company A

Growth-stage SaaS

ARR +31%; concentration rising

Headline growth is healthy, but the top three customers now represent a materially larger share of revenue.

Company B

Marketplace

Pipeline up; conversion mixed

Sales activity improved, but funnel quality is not yet reflected in realized revenue or repeat usage.

Company C

Vertical software

KPIs stable; runway on plan

Performance remains consistent with the prior quarter, and no major new execution dependency has appeared.

Company D

AI-enabled services

AI cost down; margin unchanged

Operational efficiency claims are not yet translating into a measurable margin improvement at the company level.

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

A review package built for the next investor conversation.

The exact format can be adapted to the investor's existing board, portfolio, and reporting workflow. The objective is to preserve context and make the next questions explicit.

COMPANY VIEW

Portfolio Review Brief

A concise assessment of what changed, what remains healthy, and what deserves closer investor attention.

CHANGE TRACKING

Risk & Change Log

Material shifts in KPIs, assumptions, dependencies, leadership, cash, or commercial performance since the prior review.

MANAGEMENT

Questions for the Next Conversation

Prioritized questions for management, the board, or the next investor update based on unresolved issues.

ATTENTION

90-Day Watchlist

The small number of metrics, assumptions, or milestones that should be checked again before the next review.

CAPITAL

Follow-on Lens

Current evidence that may matter if the investor is considering additional capital, reserves, or another financing round.

PORTFOLIO

Attention Summary

A cross-portfolio view showing which companies can be monitored and which deserve a deeper investor conversation.

DueCap does not replace the board, management team, or investor judgment. The service helps the investor know what deserves attention and what should be asked next.

HOW A REVIEW WORKS

Use the information you already received. Add an independent review layer around it.

A portfolio review can begin with one company and later become a recurring cadence. It does not require a new reporting platform or a large integration project.

01

Select the company

Choose a company where additional visibility, a board conversation, or a follow-on decision would benefit from a fresh view.

02

Share current materials

Latest board pack, KPI reporting, financial information, management updates, prior investment context, and other relevant materials.

03

We review the changes

DueCap examines current evidence, inconsistencies, missing information, and changes in the original investment assumptions.

04

Receive the attention view

You receive a structured brief, questions, watchlist, and the issues that deserve a deeper discussion.

05

Repeat only if useful

For selected companies, the review can become quarterly or event-driven without turning into a full operating mandate.

CLEAR BOUNDARIES

Oversight for the investor. Not outsourced management of the company.

The distinction matters. DueCap is designed to improve investor visibility and decision preparation, not to become the portfolio company's operating team.

DueCap can help with

Independent review and investor-side preparation.

Reviewing reporting and operating evidence

Identifying changes, risks, and unresolved assumptions

Preparing management or board questions

Focusing attention across the portfolio

Supporting follow-on investment preparation

DueCap does not take over

Company management or regulated investment authority.

Running the portfolio company's operations

Acting as the board or replacing directors

Performing a financial audit or legal diligence

Making discretionary investment decisions

Guaranteeing company performance or outcomes

ENGAGEMENT FORMATS

Start with one company. Expand only where recurring oversight earns its place.

Portfolio Review & Oversight can remain a targeted engagement or become part of an ongoing DueCap relationship for selected companies.

SINGLE REVIEW

One Company Review

Useful before a board discussion, follow-on investment, financing event, or when an investor wants an independent current view.

Current materials review

Risk and change assessment

Management questions

90-day watchlist

RECURRING

Quarterly Portfolio Oversight

A lightweight review cadence for selected portfolio companies where the investor wants consistent visibility without building a platform team.

Quarterly company reviews

Cross-portfolio attention summary

Change tracking over time

Follow-up and board-question preparation

Start with one opportunity.

There is no need to adopt a broad outsourced model upfront. Send a live deal and evaluate the quality of the work first. If the relationship proves useful, we can discuss what else should be delegated.

Confidential by design.

Portfolio-company materials, investor context, and review outputs are handled as confidential working information and are not used as public case material without explicit permission.

Built around investor oversight.

The review is designed for investor decision preparation and attention management. It does not replace management, board responsibilities, legal review, audit, or regulated investment advice.